Showing posts with label banks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label banks. Show all posts

Tuesday, 29 November 2016

Of Demonetisation, My Cousin ‘P’, and a Polarized Population

As I write this blog post, television channels continue to beam images of long queues outside banks and ATMs, interspersed with bytes from harassed citizens. Clearly, the surprise announcement demonetising bank notes of INR 500 and INR 1,000 has caught several on the wrong foot, and disrupted day-to-day life.

But while the focus is on disruption, there’s an interesting undercurrent that many have overlooked.

A day after the announcement, I met my cousin whom we shall refer to as ‘P’ (the secrecy is for obvious reasons; I don’t want to be ostracized by my family :)). ‘P’ was livid to put it mildly; he said: “I voted for Modi and yet he has ruined my business”.

My cousin makes a living as a trader in the auto spare parts industry. He conducts a significant portion of his business transactions in cash, and by and large stays outside the tax purview. Now he is apparently engaged in ‘creative’ consultations with his accountant, which include documenting back-dated sales transactions and paying taxes as well.

To be fair to ‘P’, he is a small fry in the larger scheme of things, a minion compared to the big fishes whose sizeable unaccounted cash was the target of the demonetisation drive. However, both ‘P’ and the big fishes represent that section of the population, which firmly believes that they are justified in not paying taxes. To clarify, I’m referring to wilful disregard of lawnot ignorance of it.   

On the other side of the spectrum is the ‘cheque and TDS’ brigade of the population. Salaried individuals, for instance, who have over the years accounted for all their earnings, and paid taxes. The ‘cheque and TDS’ brigade, while suffering through long queues and a liquidity crunch, is nonetheless gleefully smiling at the woes of the why should we pay tax?brigade. Oddly, in the midst of disruption, they’ve found vindicationfor paying taxes, filing returns, not possessing unaccounted wealth— for being law-abiding citizens.

The polarization is perceptible everywhere from the streets to discussion boards. On a lighter note, the last time the Indian population was so polarized, was in 2013, when the man who announced demonetization—Prime Minister Modi—was named as the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate for the 2014 Lok Sabha election, and that worked out well for him.

Back to serious stuff. Several sections of the media are carrying reports on the flipside of demonetisation. Predictions range from a short-term disruption in economic growth, to the upside of a good monsoon being wiped off, to a structural damage to the economy and a prolonged bear phase in markets. To my mind, these are educated guesses at best, because we are in unchartered territory. How the demonetisation gambit plays out over the long-haul is anyone’s guess.  

However, what we can be certain about is how the aforementioned segments of the Indian population will act going forward.

First, the ‘cheque and TDS’ brigade. Make no mistake, this brigade will go from strength to strength. Existing members will continue to walk the line; also, its ranks will swell, thanks to new recruits who will see the upside of being on the right side of the law.

Then there’s the ‘why should we pay tax?’ brigade. Sadly, it will be naïve to believe that one brush with the law will instantly reform every unscrupulous individual. But what will change is the way they operate.


Existing systems which help them evade taxes and get away with it, will be disbanded. Instead, they will be forced to manufacture alternative ways and means to continue their corrupt practices. More importantly, thanks to the precedent of demonetisation, such individuals will be forced to constantly look over their shoulder. One can hope that over time, the combination of fear along with more anti-corruption regulations will deliver the desired results. 

As previously mentioned, how demonetisation plays out over the long-haul is anyone’s guess. But if shivering spines of several tax evaders are an indicationdemonetisation deserves at least a thumbs up.

Friday, 15 July 2016

Should Investors Tap Into Media For Investment Advice?

Last weekend at a party, I met a rather interesting individual who declared that ‘the best things in life are free’. To buttress his view, he spoke about investments, and questioned the need to engage an adviser (read pay a fee), when one can get free advice from the media i.e. publications and television channels. I’m unaware as to what drove his belief: experience or the lure of ‘free’. In any case, his views found several takers, and soon he was dishing out ‘free advice’ on the best sources of investment advice. 

To be honest, this isn’t the first time I have heard such views being expressed. Many investors are convinced that sourcing and acting on investment advice from media can be financially rewarding. But is that line of thinking prudent? Let’s find out.

Advice vs. Coverage

Any adviser worth his salt will agree that investment advice should be focused on the investor i.e. customised to his risk appetite, investment horizon and goals. The key is to navigate the investor’s portfolio through various events, and stay on course to achieve predetermined goals.

Conversely, the media typically focuses on current events and trends. The journalist/host will have a perspective in place. Domain experts contribute to the perspective with quotes and/or data. Having covered one event, the media moves on to the next.

Whether or not the coverage is apt for every investor following it, is anyone’s guess. Therein lies the fundamental difference between investment advice and media coverage.

Go Where the Wind Blows

In Feb 2016, when domestic equity markets crashed, stocks of public sector banks were among the worst hit, reeling under burgeoning bad loans. Expectedly the media coverage was negative, and most experts opined that the worst was far from over.

Between then and now, both bank stocks and equity markets have staged a smart recovery. While fundamentally not much has changed, appreciating stock prices have resulted in sections of the media putting a positive spin on PSU bank stocks with experts stating “You can’t do away with SBI. If it’s not in our portfolio, we are missing out on India’s economic growth…” and so on. To clarify, such instances of rapidly changing positions are common in media.

Is this a case of mala fide intent? Not at all. This is simply the nature of the beast; media covers events in a manner that will appeal to its audience. Investors choosing to treat media coverage as investment advice, and acting on the same, only have themselves to blame.

Should We Shoot The Messenger?

Does the solution lie in insulating oneself from media? I don’t think so. Media can be an excellent source of information and updates. Following reputed channels and publications can help stay abreast of events. That’s where investors must draw the line.

I’m not suggesting that every investor must engage an adviser. There are several who are conversant with the nuances of investing, and don’t need to engage an expert.

As for investors who need assistance, but have never paid for investment advice, admittedly it can be a difficult threshold to cross. But there’s a need to weigh up the downside of a misguided investment versus the cost of acquiring prudent and expert investment advice

In any case, relying on media for investment advice seems like an imprudent choice.